Friday, September 7, 2012

Love vs Law (1 Corinthians 13)

In the lyrically titled "love chapter" of the Bible, some references seem obscure. What is "that which is perfect"? God is the one who is perfect, so that is who, but since this chapter is about love, then it must be referring to the love of God, His specific presence, as He IS love. What is Paul comparing it to, here? What is it that will be "done away with", in a similar manner to prophesy and knowledge?

When Yeshuah arrives, in person, "we will know as we are known."  Our knowledge will be complete, so there will be no more teachings. When we dwell with Him in the new Jerusalem, there will be no more prophesy, for He was it's goal. He is the Logos, the full revelation of the Father.

There is another reference in this section that will help us find what the identity of the "partial" is.  There is mention of "childish things". This same child scenario is mentioned in Galatians where the law is said to be a teacher. Children are always under tutors, learning how to act like adults.

The Torah is a shadow of His righteousness, a picture of His behavior. It talks of love, but cannot impart it. That is why the law cannot save us. It cannot instill anything in us but fear, because it was given down to condemn unlawfull behavior. That is why "the fear of the Lord" is only the beginning of wisdom, "because fear has to do with punishment."

When love has come, His love, it lights a fire of devotion far more compelling  than simple fear. His love is the perfect. Our gratitude makes us helpless against it and willingly so. We love, because He first loved us. All those actions required by law, now come naturally to those who have the spirit, the love of God, in us. He wants us properly and correctly motivated, so we will be totally dedicated to His good purposes. True Christians are, by definition, obeying the Torah, and observing the feasts and the Sabbath. For example, the Sabbath is His completed work on the cross! (What part of "it is
finished!" don't you understand?)


No comments: